A comparative analysis of Covid-19-related prejudice: the United States, Spain, Italy, and New Zealand

Stephen M. Croucher, Thao Nguyen, Erika Pearson, Niki Murray, Angela Feekery, Anthony Spencer, Oscar Gomez, Davide Girardelli, Stephanie Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Following the global outbreak of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), different countries took different approaches to informing their citizens about the pandemic and planned local public health initiatives. We use online participant panels in 4 affected countries–the US, Spain, Italy, and New Zealand–to explore the extent to which prejudice to Asian ethnic groups differed in these countries during the first wave of the pandemic. We argue that New Zealand’s lower scores on most indices of prejudice can be understood in part due to New Zealand’s cohesive, centralized government response to the pandemic that started early, included clear stages of response, and was led consistently by an a-political, public health and facts-base framing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-89
JournalCommunication Research Reports
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative analysis of Covid-19-related prejudice: the United States, Spain, Italy, and New Zealand'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this