An analysis of readmissions to a mental health court

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Mental health courts (MHCs) have emerged as one option to address the needs of people with severe mental illness who enter the criminal justice system. Little is known about defendants having multiple referrals to MHCs or the outcomes of subsequent admissions. This study included a sample of 1,084 defendants referred to municipal MHC. During the 13-year study period, 14.3% of defendants had a second admission, with an estimated probability of readmission of 17.4%. Key factors associated with readmission included being eligible to participate in the court but choosing not to do so, being rearrested during court supervision, and having a negative termination from supervision. Defendants who had a second admission during the study period had poorer outcomes than those with one admission. When defendants are referred for readmission to MHCs, careful assessment is required to ensure that these courts are the best alternative for them.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)237-249
Number of pages13
JournalSocial Work Research
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Mental health courts
  • Readmission
  • Recidivism
  • Severe mental illness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An analysis of readmissions to a mental health court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this