TY - GEN
T1 - Comparison of FEM and ESM in Modeling Outdoor Sound Propagating over a Smooth-Random Hard Surface
AU - Daniel, Ocansey Teye
AU - Bikdash, Marwan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - The propagation of outdoor noise over a semi-infinite domain is computationally challenging, especially for Finite Element Method (FEM) because the number of Degrees of Freedom (DOF) grows cubically with the domain size and resolution, and the resolution grows linearly with frequency or wavenumber. The memory needed to store the FEM matrices and the CPU time thus increase at least cubically. The Equivalent Source Method (ESM) is an alternative to the FEM and can be used to model sound transmission above an arbitrary reasonably smooth surface. The number of additional Equivalent Sources grows quadratically with the domain size and the resolution. We developed an algorithm to place the boundary points and the equivalent sources automatically. The complex magnitudes and phase of the small extra sources are solved using least-squares (LS). The relative error between the two methods for an arbitrary surface is less than 2%. The CPU time also favors the ESM over a significant frequency range, for which we were able to compute the FEM solutions.
AB - The propagation of outdoor noise over a semi-infinite domain is computationally challenging, especially for Finite Element Method (FEM) because the number of Degrees of Freedom (DOF) grows cubically with the domain size and resolution, and the resolution grows linearly with frequency or wavenumber. The memory needed to store the FEM matrices and the CPU time thus increase at least cubically. The Equivalent Source Method (ESM) is an alternative to the FEM and can be used to model sound transmission above an arbitrary reasonably smooth surface. The number of additional Equivalent Sources grows quadratically with the domain size and the resolution. We developed an algorithm to place the boundary points and the equivalent sources automatically. The complex magnitudes and phase of the small extra sources are solved using least-squares (LS). The relative error between the two methods for an arbitrary surface is less than 2%. The CPU time also favors the ESM over a significant frequency range, for which we were able to compute the FEM solutions.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85056199229
U2 - 10.1109/SECON.2018.8479227
DO - 10.1109/SECON.2018.8479227
M3 - Conference contribution
T3 - Conference Proceedings - IEEE SOUTHEASTCON
BT - Southeastcon 2018
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2018 IEEE Southeastcon, Southeastcon 2018
Y2 - 19 April 2018 through 22 April 2018
ER -