Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Corrigendum to “ Kinetics and microbial ecology of batch sulfidogenic bioreactors for co-treatment of municipal wastewater and acid mine drainage” [J. Hazard. Mater. (2016) 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.11.041] (S0304389415302417) (10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.11.041))

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The authors regret that their paper titled “Kinetics and microbial ecology of batch sulfidogenic bioreactors for co-treatment of municipal wastewater and acid mine drainage” contains an error: Recently we have found that there was a mistake in calculation of Km value. The paper currently states Km = 4.3 mg/L, but the Km value should have been 6220 mg/L. The changes that need to be made include correcting the Km value in the abstract and Table 2, and a revision to the statement in a paragraph: Original: “The maximum COD oxidation rate (Vmax) and Michaelis–Menten constant (Km) were estimated as 0.33 mg/L min and 4.3 mg/L, respectively (Fig. 1a). The Km value was comparable to a similar study using mining granular sludge as a source of SRB [43] and lower than other studies using pure SRB cultures [4–46] (Table 2). The relatively low value of Km obtained in this study suggested that Vmax can be reasonably achieved in the co-treatment process given the typical COD values in MWW and anticipated mixing with AMD” We propose to change this paragraph to “The maximum COD oxidation rate (Vmax) and Michaelis–Menten constant (Km) were estimated as 0.33 mg/L min and 6220 mg/L, respectively (Fig. 1a). The Km value was much higher than studies using mining granular sludge as a source of SRB [43] and other studies using pure SRB cultures [4–46] (Table 2).”
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Hazardous Materials
Volume353
Issue numberIssue
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “ Kinetics and microbial ecology of batch sulfidogenic bioreactors for co-treatment of municipal wastewater and acid mine drainage” [J. Hazard. Mater. (2016) 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.11.041] (S0304389415302417) (10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.11.041))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this