TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-cultural measurement validation: an analysis of dissent, workplace freedom of speech, and perceived immediacy
AU - Croucher, Stephen M.
AU - Kelly, Stephanie E
AU - Ashwell, Doug
AU - Condon, Shawn
AU - Tootell, Beth
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - Croucher and Kelly (2019) laid out guidelines to develop measures that can be used across cultures. The present study provides support for their guidelines, indicating that pancultural measurements cannot be behavioral and should not include unnecessary contexts; however, they should be worded as simplistically as possible. This study utilizes measures of dissent, perceived immediacy, and workplace freedom of speech in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. Only the perceived immediacy measure, which follows Croucher and Kelly’s (2019) guidelines, maintained internal consistency.
AB - Croucher and Kelly (2019) laid out guidelines to develop measures that can be used across cultures. The present study provides support for their guidelines, indicating that pancultural measurements cannot be behavioral and should not include unnecessary contexts; however, they should be worded as simplistically as possible. This study utilizes measures of dissent, perceived immediacy, and workplace freedom of speech in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. Only the perceived immediacy measure, which follows Croucher and Kelly’s (2019) guidelines, maintained internal consistency.
KW - culture
KW - Measurement
KW - pancultural
KW - validity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85188056460&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85188056460&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1080/08824096.2024.2327545
DO - 10.1080/08824096.2024.2327545
M3 - Article
SN - 0882-4096
VL - 41
SP - 71
EP - 81
JO - Communication Research Reports
JF - Communication Research Reports
IS - 2
ER -
