Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Enhancing Nutrition and Obesity Research Collaborations across Institutions: Lessons from a North Carolina Focus Group

  • Shelly A Maras
  • , Dana Carthron
  • , Ashley Irwin
  • , Alice S Ammerman
  • , Saame Raza Shaikh
  • , Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Department of Nutrition
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: There is a need to support underrepresented groups (URGs) of investigators, especially early-stage investigators, in the fields of nutrition and obesity in which substantial health inequities exist among URGs. There is also a critical need to promote diverse collaborations among researchers in the field to increase heterogeneity and scientific rigor. Collaborations between Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Predominantly White Institutions (PWIs) provide opportunities for career development among investigators from URGs in biomedical research; however, little is known about the barriers and facilitators to successful collaborations. Objectives: This study aims to understand the experiences of URG researchers involved in collaborations between HBCUs and PWIs to identify barriers and facilitators of success. Methods: We conducted a virtual focus group (n = 12) over Zoom, which comprised administrative staff and faculty members from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, a research-intensive PWI, and North Carolina Central University, a regionally adjacent HBCU. A professional facilitator led participants through a discussion where they were asked about their experiences in past collaborations between HBCUs and PWIs. Using inductive coding, our team developed a codebook from the focus group transcript, and we analyzed the data using a quasi-grounded theory approach. Results: Analysis of the focus group revealed 3 themes: 1) inequity of the collaborative process, 2) misalignment of capacity and expectations, and 3) stereotypes held by researchers at PWIs. These themes highlight barriers that have prevented mutually beneficial collaborations from forming among the focus group participants. Conclusions: To promote mutually beneficial research collaborations between PWIs and HBCUs and, ultimately, to promote diversity among investigators in nutrition and obesity research, awareness must be drawn to the barriers to success in these relationships. It is imperative that institutions have conversations surrounding resources, research capacity, and expectations upon entering such research collaborations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1281-1285
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume121
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • collaborations
  • dietary studies
  • interinstitutional collaborations
  • nutrition research
  • obesity research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enhancing Nutrition and Obesity Research Collaborations across Institutions: Lessons from a North Carolina Focus Group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this