TY - GEN
T1 - Formalization of the responsive and formal design process using category theory
AU - Gebreyohannes, Solomon
AU - Edmonson, William
AU - Esterline, Albert
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2018/5/30
Y1 - 2018/5/30
N2 - In this paper, we formalize the Responsive and Formal Design (RFD) process using category theory. The RFD process combines Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) to manage system modeling complexity and formal methods to ensure that designs are verifiably correct against their requirements. It consists of a set of levels of abstraction. Each level of abstraction represents a set of requirements and its associated models, simulations, and the relationship between them. Abstraction and refinement functions relate different levels of representation. In this paper, we represent and analyze the RFD process using category theory. Category theory provides us a means (using a collection of objects and arrows) to represent each level of abstractions and communications between them. We represent each level of abstraction using a pullback categorical structure (define the objects and morphisms). The facts and theorems in one level of abstraction will be passed to another via a refinement or an abstraction functor (function). The two functors operate in an inverse (adjoint) relationship. This means refinement traceability is met in the design process fundamentally. Additionally, since adjunction is a weaker relation than any other relations (such as equality, isomorphism, and equivalence) between two categories, it is a relatively better option for relaxing the design space. Finally, we introduce an idea of defining a category of refinements (i.e. a category of functors) and interpreting the universal properties.
AB - In this paper, we formalize the Responsive and Formal Design (RFD) process using category theory. The RFD process combines Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) to manage system modeling complexity and formal methods to ensure that designs are verifiably correct against their requirements. It consists of a set of levels of abstraction. Each level of abstraction represents a set of requirements and its associated models, simulations, and the relationship between them. Abstraction and refinement functions relate different levels of representation. In this paper, we represent and analyze the RFD process using category theory. Category theory provides us a means (using a collection of objects and arrows) to represent each level of abstractions and communications between them. We represent each level of abstraction using a pullback categorical structure (define the objects and morphisms). The facts and theorems in one level of abstraction will be passed to another via a refinement or an abstraction functor (function). The two functors operate in an inverse (adjoint) relationship. This means refinement traceability is met in the design process fundamentally. Additionally, since adjunction is a weaker relation than any other relations (such as equality, isomorphism, and equivalence) between two categories, it is a relatively better option for relaxing the design space. Finally, we introduce an idea of defining a category of refinements (i.e. a category of functors) and interpreting the universal properties.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85048876508
U2 - 10.1109/SYSCON.2018.8369508
DO - 10.1109/SYSCON.2018.8369508
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85048876508
T3 - 12th Annual IEEE International Systems Conference, SysCon 2018 - Proceedings
SP - 1
EP - 8
BT - 12th Annual IEEE International Systems Conference, SysCon 2018 - Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 12th Annual IEEE International Systems Conference, SysCon 2018
Y2 - 24 April 2018 through 26 April 2018
ER -