TY - JOUR
T1 - Free Energy Dependencies for Interfacial Electron Transfer from Tin-Doped Indium Oxide (ITO) to Molecular Photoredox Catalysts
AU - Bangle, Rachel
AU - Schneider, Jenny
AU - Loague, Quentin
AU - Kessinger, Matthew
AU - Müller, Andressa V.
AU - Meyer, Gerald J.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - John B. Goodenough proposed that interfacial electron transfer kinetics from main group metal oxides should be fundamentally differentfrom that of transition metal oxides, an expectation that has not been widely tested. Herein, the kinetics for interfacial electron transferfrom mesoporous transparent conductive oxide Tin-doped Indium Oxide (ITO) to four photoredox catalysts (PCs) were characterized inacetonitrile electrolytes. The photocatalysts had the form: [Ru(4,4 -R2-2,2 -bipyridine)2(4,4 -(PO3H2)2-2,2 -bipyridine)]2 , where RwasH,methoxy, tert-butyl, and Br. The impact of the surface binding group was characterized with [Ru(2,2 -bipyridine)2(4,4 -(CO2H)2-bpy)]2 .The interfacial electron transfer reaction ITO(e-)|PC →ITO|PC was quantified by nanosecond absorption spectroscopy as a function ofthe applied potential (and hence -ΔG°). Specific conditions of applied potential were identified where the kinetics were sensitive to theincident irradiance. A layer-by-layer method was used to insert ionic methylene bridge(s) between the PC and the oxide surface. Marcus-Gerischer analysis of the kinetic data indicates non-adiabatic interfacial electron transfer with total reorganization energies that increasewhen bridges were placed between the photocatalyst and the ITO surface.
AB - John B. Goodenough proposed that interfacial electron transfer kinetics from main group metal oxides should be fundamentally differentfrom that of transition metal oxides, an expectation that has not been widely tested. Herein, the kinetics for interfacial electron transferfrom mesoporous transparent conductive oxide Tin-doped Indium Oxide (ITO) to four photoredox catalysts (PCs) were characterized inacetonitrile electrolytes. The photocatalysts had the form: [Ru(4,4 -R2-2,2 -bipyridine)2(4,4 -(PO3H2)2-2,2 -bipyridine)]2 , where RwasH,methoxy, tert-butyl, and Br. The impact of the surface binding group was characterized with [Ru(2,2 -bipyridine)2(4,4 -(CO2H)2-bpy)]2 .The interfacial electron transfer reaction ITO(e-)|PC →ITO|PC was quantified by nanosecond absorption spectroscopy as a function ofthe applied potential (and hence -ΔG°). Specific conditions of applied potential were identified where the kinetics were sensitive to theincident irradiance. A layer-by-layer method was used to insert ionic methylene bridge(s) between the PC and the oxide surface. Marcus-Gerischer analysis of the kinetic data indicates non-adiabatic interfacial electron transfer with total reorganization energies that increasewhen bridges were placed between the photocatalyst and the ITO surface.
UR - https://dx.doi.org/10.1149/2162-8777/ac5169
U2 - 10.1149/2162-8777/ac5169
DO - 10.1149/2162-8777/ac5169
M3 - Article
VL - 11
JO - ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology
JF - ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology
IS - Issue 2
ER -