Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Hydrologic and water quality modeling: Spatial and temporal considerations

  • C. Baffaut
  • , S. M. Dabney
  • , M. D. Smolen
  • , M. A. Youssef
  • , J. V. Bonta
  • , M. L. Chu
  • , J. A. Guzman
  • , V. S. Shedekar
  • , Manoj K Jha
  • , Jeffrey Arnold
  • USDA Agricultural Research Service
  • USDA-ARS Watershed Physical Processes Research Unit
  • Oklahoma State University
  • North Carolina State University
  • Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
  • USDA-ARS Grazinglands Research Laboratory
  • Department of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering
  • Industrial and systems engineering with North Carolina A&T State University
  • Watershed Management Research Unit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

57 Scopus citations

Abstract

Hydrologic and water quality models are used to help manage water resources by investigating the effects of climate, land use, land management, and water management on water resources. Water-related issues are investigated over a range of scales, i.e., the extent and resolution of the spatial and temporal contexts, which can vary spatially from point to watershed and temporally from seconds to centuries. In addition, models' formulations may place scale restrictions on their use. In 2012, ASABE published a collection of 22 articles on the calibration, validation, and use of 25 hydrologic and water quality models. Each article detailed the process to follow and the issues that could arise during calibration or application of a specific model. The objective of this article is to synthesize those articles with regard to common spatial and temporal scale principles that should guide selecting, parameterizing, and calibrating a hydrologic model. This article describes how the spatio-temporal extent and resolution of a model application should relate to the modeling objectives, the processes simulated, the parameterization and calibration process, data available for parameterization and calibration, and interpretation of results. Overall, the intended scale of the model should match the scale of the processes that need to be simulated given the modeling objectives, the scale of input and calibration data should be compatible with the scale of the model and with the objectives of the study, and the model should be calibrated at the scale at which the results will be analyzed and interpreted.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1661-1680
Number of pages20
JournalTransactions of the ASABE
Volume58
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  3. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • Calibration
  • Hydrologic modeling
  • Scale
  • Spatial
  • Temporal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hydrologic and water quality modeling: Spatial and temporal considerations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this