TY - JOUR
T1 - Nonpoint-Source Pollution Reduction for an Iowa Watershed: An Application of Evolutionary Algorithms
AU - Rabotyagov, Sergey S.
AU - Jha, Manoj K
AU - Campbell, Todd D.
PY - 2010/12/1
Y1 - 2010/12/1
N2 - We apply an integrated simulation-optimization framework to search for cost-efficient mix and location of agricultural conservation practices in a typical agricultural watershed for two types of nitrogen reduction targets: control of mean annual nitrogen loadings, and a "safety-first" type constraint, insisting that nitrogen targets be met in every weather realization (weather-resilient solutions). Evolutionary algorithms are developed for each of the appropriate water quality targets. Our approach allows for the derivation of a watershed-level total and marginal nitrogen abatement cost curve. Controlling for the probability of meeting water quality targets (looking for weather-resilient solutions) is found to be significantly more costly than controlling the average nitrogen loadings. Both types of solutions are assessed for robustness with respect to weather uncertainty: solutions selected to reduce average loadings do well under weather uncertainty, while the robustness of solutions selected to be resilient decreases with the stringency of the water quality goal. © 2010 Canadian Agricultural Economics Society.
AB - We apply an integrated simulation-optimization framework to search for cost-efficient mix and location of agricultural conservation practices in a typical agricultural watershed for two types of nitrogen reduction targets: control of mean annual nitrogen loadings, and a "safety-first" type constraint, insisting that nitrogen targets be met in every weather realization (weather-resilient solutions). Evolutionary algorithms are developed for each of the appropriate water quality targets. Our approach allows for the derivation of a watershed-level total and marginal nitrogen abatement cost curve. Controlling for the probability of meeting water quality targets (looking for weather-resilient solutions) is found to be significantly more costly than controlling the average nitrogen loadings. Both types of solutions are assessed for robustness with respect to weather uncertainty: solutions selected to reduce average loadings do well under weather uncertainty, while the robustness of solutions selected to be resilient decreases with the stringency of the water quality goal. © 2010 Canadian Agricultural Economics Society.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78449297273&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78449297273&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2010.01198.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2010.01198.x
M3 - Article
SN - 0008-3976
VL - 58
SP - 411
EP - 431
JO - Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics
JF - Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics
IS - 4
ER -