Quantitatively defining and mapping rural: A case study of North Carolina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Contemporary research has measured differences between rural and its urban/suburban counterparts on the backdrop of social, economic, political and health phenomena. However, given the ambiguity of its definition, varying meanings and applications of the word ‘rural’ exist. In this paper we explored three different popular uses of the term rural on the backdrop of quantitative data with findings highlighting 1) there do exist statistical differences in data depending upon how rural is defined and 2) the definition of rural provided through the USDA's Rural-Urban Commuting Areas (RUCA) best aligned with other definitions of rural.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-56
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Rural Studies
Volume97
Issue numberIssue
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2023

Keywords

  • Geographic information systems
  • Rural geography
  • Statistical analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitatively defining and mapping rural: A case study of North Carolina'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this