Abstract
This article contains two measurement development studies on writing apprehension. Study 1 reexamines the validity of the writing apprehension measure based on the finding from prior research that a second false factor was embedded. The findings from Study 1 support the validity of a reduced measure with 6 items versus the original 20-item measure. However, this shorter measure had poor reliability. Therefore, Study 2 sought to correct the reliability issue by updating the wording of items so it was applicable to broader platforms of writing. The final measure had excellent reliability and validity statistics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 516-529 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Business and Professional Communication Quarterly |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1 2017 |
Keywords
- business communication
- immediacy
- measurement
- self-efficacy
- writing apprehension