TY - JOUR
T1 - Robotic destructive and nondestructive testing of concrete structures
AU - Roudsari, Sajjad Sayyar
AU - Okore-Hanson, Theophilus
AU - Hamoush, Sameer A.
AU - Yi, Sun
AU - Shalbaftabar, Armaghan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Institution of Structural Engineers
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Structural elements may develop defects due to severe environmental conditions. Nondestructive testing is a common method for structural evaluations; however, these structures may be inaccessible or located in unsafe areas. In this paper, a Sawyer robot was employed to carry nondestructive testing (NDT) sensors such as Ground Penetration Radar (GPR) and Impact Echo (IE). The experiment comprised twelve reinforced concrete beams divided into four groups: Control (without defects), Void, Corrosion, and Debonding. The beams underwent three-point bending tests, with loads distributed across three levels: 50 %, 75 %, and 100 % of the failure load. Robotic and handheld IE and GPR tests were conducted, with IE performed before the actual test and GPR conducted before, during, and after the tests. Load-displacement diagrams were subsequently generated. The comparison between robotic and handheld tests demonstrated the high accuracy of the robotic NDT and indicated that the defects led to reduced load capacity and increased crack propagation.
AB - Structural elements may develop defects due to severe environmental conditions. Nondestructive testing is a common method for structural evaluations; however, these structures may be inaccessible or located in unsafe areas. In this paper, a Sawyer robot was employed to carry nondestructive testing (NDT) sensors such as Ground Penetration Radar (GPR) and Impact Echo (IE). The experiment comprised twelve reinforced concrete beams divided into four groups: Control (without defects), Void, Corrosion, and Debonding. The beams underwent three-point bending tests, with loads distributed across three levels: 50 %, 75 %, and 100 % of the failure load. Robotic and handheld IE and GPR tests were conducted, with IE performed before the actual test and GPR conducted before, during, and after the tests. Load-displacement diagrams were subsequently generated. The comparison between robotic and handheld tests demonstrated the high accuracy of the robotic NDT and indicated that the defects led to reduced load capacity and increased crack propagation.
KW - Corrosion
KW - Debonding
KW - GPR
KW - IE
KW - Robotic and Hand-Held NDT
KW - Void
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85207966966
U2 - 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107564
DO - 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107564
M3 - Article
SN - 2352-0124
VL - 70
JO - Structures
JF - Structures
M1 - 107564
ER -