Abstract
Science writing, such as lab reports, allows students to form a meaningful understanding of scientific concepts. However, students often view scientific writing as unimportant and utilize surface level approaches when completing writing assignments. The current study implemented three experimental interventions (directly-communicated, self-generated, and hybrid) aligned with prior literature and designed to improve the utility value of lab reports in college settings. Participants (n = 1,002) were recruited from 43 lab sections of an introductory biology course at a large southeastern university. Measures of subjective task value (utility value, attainment value, cost, and intrinsic value) were collected pre-, mid-, and post-intervention. The self-generated and hybrid groups exhibited higher self-reported utility value by posttest compared to the control group. Requiring students to generate their own utility value toward a task, followed by a written reflection, increases students' maintained and situational interest for biology laboratory reports.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 232-252 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Journal of Research in Science Teaching |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 1 2020 |
Keywords
- educational intervention
- expectancy-value
- postsecondary education
- science
- utility value
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Utility value interventions in a college biology lab: The impact on motivation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver